Telerehabilitation for visual field defects with a multisensory training: a feasibility study

Table 2 Baseline stability in the wait-list (WL) group

Variable	Pre-1	Pre	Comparison
EF test–accuracy	83.4 ± 16.7%	88.3 ± 12.2%	p = 0.06
Triangles test–accuracy	72.6 ± 15.4%	77.2 ± 15.4%	p = 0.17
Numbers Test–RTs (ms)	35.17 ± 10.47	34.08 ± 12.28	p = 0.31
Reading speed (syll/s)	3.6 ± 1.5	3.6 ± 1.5	p = 0.99
Visual field size (MD, db)	− 13.2 ± 4	− 14 ± 2.7	p = 0.15
v-ADLs	9.5 ± 4.6	9.2 ± 4.6	p = 0.47
HDRS	7.7 ± 6.8	7 ± 6	p = 0.48

For the visual exploration tests (EF, Triangles, and Numbers), the visual field assessment, and the vision-dependent activities of daily living (v-ADLs) questionnaire, n = 13 participants were analyzed. Twelve participants completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and 10 participants completed the reading test. Those participants who could not complete the latter tests had reading impairments due to left-hemispheric lesion
MD, mean deviation in decibels at 30–2 visual field testing; Pre, baseline assessment immediately before the beginning of treatment; Pre-1, additional baseline assessment one month before the beginning of the treatment; RTs, response times

ISSN: 1743-0003