Outcomes | Muscle | Assessment | Intervention group (tSCS + Lokomat) | Control Group (sham tSCS + Lokomat) | Comparison of changes Intervention vs. control Mean difference (95% CI) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Change score | Mean (SD) | Change score | Post | Baseline-Follow | |||
Threshold (%) | RF | Pre- | 53.64 (20.60) | − 3.18 (13.63)$ | 49.90 (9.93) | − 1.30 (2.16)$ | − 1.88 (− 11.031 to 7.26)& | − 4.45 (− 13.39 to 4.48)& |
Post- | 50.45 (13.23) | 48.60 (9.36) | ||||||
Follow-up | 49.18 (12.27) | − 4.45 (12.34)$ | 49.90 (10.00) | 0.00 (5.71)$ | ||||
TA | Pre- | 43.82 (9.80) | 0.63 (4.80)$ | 47.22 (10.03) | − 0.44 (2.13)$ | − 1.08 (− 2.55 to 4.71)& | 1.45 (− 1.98 to 4.89)& | |
Post- | 44.45 (9.47) | 46.78 (9.87) | ||||||
Follow-up | 44.27 (9.10) | 0.45 (4.08)$ | 46.22 (10.23) | − 1.00 (3.00)$ | ||||
Peak-to-peak Amplitude (mV) | RF | Pre- | 4.77 (2.44) | − 0.16 (1.67)* | 7.17 (3.02) | − 0.90 (3.72)* | 0.75 (− 2.39 to 3.90)⌘ | 2.40 (0.00 to 4.80)⌘ p < 0.05 |
Post- | 4.61 (1.38) | 6.27 (3.41) | ||||||
Follow-up | 3.79 (0.85) | − 0.97 (1.82)* | 3.78 (1.49) | − 3.39 (2.34)* p < 0.01 | ||||
TA | Pre- | 14.76 (7.81) | 2.22 (7.45)$ | 14.69 (16.39) | 0.40 (3.60)$ | 1.82 (− 9.76 to 6.12)& | − 7.26 (− 26.76 to 12.24)& | |
Post- | 16.98 (8.29) | 15.09 (16.18) | ||||||
Follow-up | 22.03 (22.72) | 7.27 (18.26)$ | 14.70 (10.78) | 0.01 (8.97)$ | ||||
Latency (ms) | RF | Pre- | 33.38 (5.31) | − 1.31 (3.29)* | 32.43 (3.97) | 2.59 (2.92)* | − 3.92 (− 7.66 to − 0.17)⌘ p < 0.05 | − 1.95 (− 7.49 to 3.58)⌘ |
Post- | 32.12 (4.67) | 35.02 (4.40) | ||||||
Follow-up | 31.71 (4.39) | − 1.67(3.80)* | 32.44 (5.23) | 0.01 (5.80)* | ||||
TA | Pre- | 46.43 (7.36) | − 3.08 (4.20)* | 46.68 (13.87) | 7.45 (30.45)* | − 10.53 (− 31.10 to 9.50)⌘ | 1.40 (− 6.62 to 9.42)⌘ | |
Post- | 43.36 (6.39) | 54,13 (18.41) | ||||||
Follow-up | 43.76 (5.29) | − 2.67 (3.93)* | 42.48 (7.82) | − 4.20 (10.66)* |