Table 2 Quantitative statistics analysis from Fig. 6

Zeni et al. [5]

− 7 [− 9 − 7]

− 3 [− 3 − 3]

1 [1 4]

< 0.001

− 3 [− 3 − 3]

1 [1 1]

5 [5 5]

< 0.001

Desailly et al. [4]

− 8 [− 9 − 8]

− 2 [− 2 − 2]

3 [3 4]

< 0.001

− 4 [− 5 − 2]

1 [1 2]

7 [6 8]

< 0.001

Ghoussayni et al. [7]

− 7 [− 9 − 5]

− 1 [− 1 − 1]

4 [3 7]

< 0.001

− 6 [− 7 − 4]

0 [0 0]

5 [4 6]

< 0.001

Bruening and Ridge [11]

− 7 [− 8 − 7]

− 1 [− 1 − 1]

4 [4 5]

< 0.001

− 4 [− 4 − 4]

0 [0 0]

4 [4 4]

< 0.001

Bonci et al. [6]

− 6 [− 7 − 6]

0 [0 0]

5 [5 6]

< 0.001

− 3 [− 3 − 3]

1 [1 1]

5 [5 5]

< 0.001

O’Connor et al. [8]

− 4 [− 7 − 4]

0 [0 0]

4 [4 6]

< 0.001

− 6 [− 7 − 6]

− 1 [− 1 0]

5 [5 6]

< 0.001

Hsue et al. [10]

− 4 [− 4 − 1]

4 [4 5]

12 [10 12]

< 0.001

− 2 [− 2 − 2]

2 [2 2]

6 [6 6]

< 0.001

Hreljac and Marshall [9]

− 1 [− 6 − 1]

1 [1 1]

2 [2 7]

< 0.001

− 2 [− 2 − 2]

2 [2 2]

6 [6 6]

< 0.001

MC7*

− 1 [− 2 − 1]

0 [0 0]

2 [2 3]

< 0.001*

− 2 [− 5 − 2]

0 [0 0]

1 [1 3]

< 0.001*