Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcome measure scores

From: The influence of scaffolding on intrinsic motivation and autonomous adherence to a game-based, sparsely supervised home rehabilitation program for people with upper extremity hemiparesis due to stroke. A randomized controlled trial

 

Intrinsic motivation inventory

Minutes

Sessions

UEFMA

ARAT

SIS Hand

SIS ADL

SIS participation

Pre

Post

Δ

Total

Total

Pre

Post

Δ

Pre

Post

Δ

Pre

Post

Δ

Pre

Post

Δ

Pre

Post

Δ

EM

65.30 (6.0)

70.91 (6.8)

5.62 (4.4)*

966 Med [442–1570]

37.15 (17.6)

43.00 (14.3)

48.23 (11.9)

5.23 (3.2)**

26.08 (20.2)

31.69 (20.8)

5.62 (4.9)**

12.71 (4.8)

14.4 (5.5)

1.81 (2.5)

35.10 (5.8)

38.49 (6.3)

3.39 (2.2)*

25.60 (8.4)

27.46 (6.8)

2.05 (2.5)

AC

69.27 (6.8)

73.49 (6.1)

4.22 (5.7)**

680 Med [412–902]

47.67 (16.4)

43.07 (12)

49.47 (11.3)

6.40 (2.5)**

32.33 (17.7)

35.93 (17.5)

3.47 (3.9)*

14.37 (5.7)

15.40 (5.5)

0.82 (3.7)*

37.08 (7.4)

38.85 (6.6)

1.77 (2.9)**

27.99 (6.7)

27.57 (10.2)

1.66 (2.7)*

Group

67.42 (6.6)

72.29 (6.5)

4.87 (5)**

765 Med [440–1071]

42.79 (16.4)

43.04 (12.9)

48.89 (11.4)

5.86 (2.8)**

29.43 (18.9)

33.96 (18.9)

4.46 (4.5)**

13.60 (5.3)

14.96 (5.4)

1.28 (3.28)*

36.16 (6.7)

38.68 (6.4)

2.52 (2.7)**

26.88 (7.5)

27.52 (8.6)

1.84 (2.6)

  1. EM = Enhanced Motivation, AC = Algorithm Controlled, (Standard Deviation), Δ Change, Med Median, [Interquartile Range], IMI Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, UEFMA Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment, ARAT Action Research Arm Test, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, ADL Activities of Daily Living
  2. **p < 0.001, *p < 0.05