Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the two conditions in CoP path, loading force, and percentage of loading time

From: Effects of ankle joint degree of freedom of knee–ankle–foot orthoses on loading patterns and triceps surae muscle activity on the paretic side in individuals with subacute severe hemiplegia: a retrospective study

Gait parameters

Fixed, n = 31

Free, n = 31

Mean difference

95% CI

Effect size

p-value

CoP path

 AP_CoP (mm)

34 [16, 52]

41 [18, 89]

10.8

2.6, 19.1

0.79

0.011

 ML_CoP (mm)

8 [6, 13]

10 [7, 21]

1.9

− 0.81, 4.7

0.42

0.159

Loading force

 Maximum loading (N)

215 [140, 288]

206 [148, 277]

− 24

− 56.9, 8.9

− 0.43

0.149

 Average loading (N)

144 [104, 183]

141 [101, 194]

− 12.4

− 34.4, 9.5

− 0.34

0.26

Percentage of loading time

 Heel (%)

81 [46, 97]

71 [42, 98]

0.71

− 4.0, 5.5

0.08

0.764

 Hind foot (%)

9 [0, 33]

16 [0, 32]

0.02

− 5.8, 5.9

0.002

0.993

 Medial forefoot (%)

0 [0, 0]

0 [0, 7]

2.6

− 1.3, 6.5

0.37

0.196

 Lateral forefoot (%)

0 [0, 0]

0 [0, 0]

− 1.1

− 4.7, 2.5

− 0.18

0.537

Muscle activity

 

 First GCL (%GCEMG)

152 [131, 172]

161 [130, 187]

5

− 4.9, 14.9

0.26

0.316

 Second GCL (%GCEMG)

81 [72, 94]

83 [70, 96]

6.4

0.1, 12.6

0.54

0.043

 First SOL (%GCEMG)

165 [149, 177]

165 [154, 182]

4.9

− 4.8, 14.6

0.68

0.316

 Second SOL (%GCEMG)

88 [79, 112]

87 [74, 142]

6.8

− 0.7, 14.5

0.47

0.077

  1. CI, confidence interval; CoP, center-of-pressure; AP, anteroposterior; ML, mediolateral; GCL, gastrocnemius lateralis; SOL, soleus
  2. In one participant, positive estimates indicated larger values for each parameter under free conditions. Bold p-values indicate a significant difference between the fixed and free conditions. The sample size represents the number of trials
  3. Median [interquartile range], Cohen’s d